ArticlePloS one2025
First validity testing of GluciQuizz, a French self-questionnaire evaluating carb-counting for patients with type 1 diabetes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCarbohydrate intake remains one of the most influential factors affecting post-meal glucose levels in type 1 diabetes (T1D). To individualize and optimize patient education on carbohydrate counting, it is essential to assess their knowledge of carbohydrate counting. For this purpose, we aimed to produce and validate a questionnaire for French-speaking individuals based on the American AdultCarbQuiz questionnaire (43 items).
designThe translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the American questionnaire were followed by an analysis conducted by patient and diabetologist expert groups.
participants190 participants living with T1D, Diabetologist expert group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Internal consistency and reliability were verified by administering the adapted French version of the questionnaire to 190 participants living with T1D. ANALYSIS: Clinical validity was verified by examining the correlation between the questionnaire score and the time in range (TIR) of these participants.
resultsTranslation and back-translation demonstrated good consistency with the original questionnaire. Typical American food items were replaced with foods commonly consumed in France. All items were validated by both patient and diabetologist experts. After analyzing the responses of 190 participant, seven items were considered non-discriminatory and were therefore removed. Internal consistency, assessed by Cronbach's α, was high, with α = 0.785, 95 CI [0.738-0.826]. Finally, we produced a 36 item French questionnaire named GluciQuizz. TIR correlated with the GluciQuizz score (r = 0.3; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study validates a French-language self-administered questionnaire (GluciQuizz), which evaluates different domains of carbohydrate knowledge in a 15-minute quiz for people living with T1D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.