Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39999059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Social and nutritional factors controlling the growth of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens.

Omer Kama, Hagai Yehoshua Shpigler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omer KamaDepartment of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Hagai Yehoshua ShpiglerDepartment of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1369-4112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honey bee queen is essential for colony function, laying hundreds of eggs daily and determining the colony's genetic composition. Beekeepers cultivate and trade queens to enhance colony health and productivity. Despite its significance, artificial queen rearing in foster queenless colonies has remained largely unchanged for over a century, offering limited control over the environmental conditions influencing larval development. In this study, we developed a laboratory-based method for queen bee rearing, establishing a protocol for rearing queens in cages by nurse bees in the lab under controlled environmental conditions. We first investigated the minimal number of worker bees required to rear a single queen and found that groups of 200 workers raise queens with comparable success and weight to those reared in foster colony. As a proof of concept, we examined the impact of larval age on rearing success in our new system. We found that younger larvae developed into heavier and larger queens than older larvae, as recorded in the past using the traditional rearing method. Additionally, we assessed the influence of pollen nutrition on queen-rearing success, finding that a high pollen concentration is crucial for optimal queen development. These findings and the new method provide a foundation for studying queen bee-rearing behavior and development in the lab. We expect that it will be used to uncover factors that impact this important process in honey bee biology.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFemaleLarvaPollen

Identifiers

PMID39999059
PMCPMC11856481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.