ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025
Characteristics of objectively-measured naturalistic light exposure patterns in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Examining photoperiod, chronotype, and adherence as predictors of morning light treatment effects on depression symptoms: A study of five clinical trials.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Association between light exposure patterns and multidimensional health outcomes in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: findings from an observational cross-sectional cohort study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Observational
- Individual-Level Exposure to Light at Night and Sleep Health: A Comparison between Real-Time Mobility-Based Measurements and Indoor Residence-Based Measurements.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Light exposure differs by sex in the US, with females receiving less bright light.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light is an environmental feature important for human physiology. Investigation of how light affects population health requires exposure assessment and personal biomonitoring efforts. Here, we derived measures of amount, duration, regularity, and timing from objective personal light (lux) measurement in >4000 participants across two United States (US)-based cohort studies, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Hispanic Community Health Study / Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), encompassing eight geographic regions. Objective light and actigraphy data were collected over a week using wrist-worn devices (Actiwatch Spectrum). Cohort-stratified light exposure metrics were analyzed in relation to sex, season, time-of-day, location, and demographic and sleep health characteristics using Spearman correlation and linear and logistic regressions (separately by cohort) adjusted for age, sex (where applicable), and exam site. Light exposure showed sex-specific patterns and had seasonal, diurnal, geographic, and demographic and sleep health-related correlates. Results between independent cohorts were strongly consistent, supporting the utility and feasibility of light biomonitoring. These findings provide a fundamental first characterization of light exposure patterns in a large US sample and will inform future work to incorporate light as a biologically relevant exposure in environmental public health and key component of the human exposome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.