Observational studyBMJ open diabetes research & care2025
Clinical phenotyping of people living with type 1 diabetes according to their levels of diabetes-related distress: results from the SFDT1 cohort.
Observational study in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04657783 (French National Cohort of People With Type 1 Diabètes), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
French National Cohort of People With Type 1 Diabètes: the SFDT1 Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial outcomes among adults with type 1 diabetes using a tubeless automated insulin delivery system compared with sensor augmented pump therapy: A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial sub-study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Trial
- What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change in Diabetes Distress? Findings for Diabetes Care and Research From the SFDT1 Cohort.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Voice changes associated with stress and distress in people living with diabetes: Results from the Colive Voice study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- A machine learning approach to predicting severe diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Observational
- Disconnect between advanced diabetes technology and psychological well-being among young people: a cross-sectional analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionType 1 diabetes is burdensome, requiring complex daily management and making people more prone to emotional distress. To better detect diabetes-related distress (DD) and identify at-risk patients, we aimed to provide an in-depth characterization of DD in people with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe included adults with type 1 diabetes from the
resultsIn total, 1220 participants (50.6% female, age 42 years (SD 13.9), diabetes duration 24.7 years (13.6)) had a total mean PAID score of 39.6 (21.7) and 592 (48.5%) reported high DD. Leading subdimensions of DD included fear of complications (50.1 (24.4)) and diabetes burnout (45.9 (24.5)). Females, younger age, social vulnerability, smoking, and the presence of retinopathy were positively associated with high DD (p<0.05). We observed similar DD levels across HbA1c levels and treatment modalities, including automated insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring use. Several psychological factors, such as anxiety/depression, poor sleep quality, and treatment burden, were strongly associated with DD (p<0.001).
conclusionsWe provide a holistic clinical phenotyping approach that enables the identification of determinants and prevalence of DD, overall and according to key DD subdimensions, in a large and diverse population. Our results underscore the importance of developing DD-targeted prevention and intervention strategies focused specifically on high-risk groups and the most impactful distress subdimensions to reduce the impact of type 1 diabetes burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04657783.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.