SynthesisBMJ open2025
Accuracy of machine learning methods in predicting prognosis of patients with psychotic spectrum disorders: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Interventions, Recovery, and Mediating Mechanisms in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Using AI to Detect Psychosis Relapse: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Views of People With Psychosis About Algorithm-Based Relapse Prediction and Data Sharing: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Uncovering the determinants of infant and toddler childcare demand in less-developed rural China: a machine learning perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based predictive factor analysis of depression among Chinese adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to examine the predictive accuracy of functioning, relapse or remission among patients with psychotic disorders, using machine learning methods. We also identified specific features that were associated with these clinical outcomes.
designThe methodology of this review was guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and ScienceDirect were searched for relevant articles from database inception until 21 November 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they involved the use of machine learning methods to predict functioning, relapse and/or remission among individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened the records from the database search. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool from Cochrane. Synthesised findings were presented in tables.
results23 studies were included in the review, which were mostly conducted in the west (91%). Predictive summary area under the curve values for functioning, relapse and remission were 0.63-0.92 (poor to outstanding), 0.45-0.95 (poor to outstanding), 0.70-0.79 (acceptable), respectively. Logistic regression and random forest were the best performing algorithms. Factors influencing outcomes included demographic (age, ethnicity), illness (duration of untreated illness, types of symptoms), functioning (baseline functioning, interpersonal relationships and activity engagement), treatment variables (use of higher doses of antipsychotics, electroconvulsive therapy), data from passive sensor (call log, distance travelled, time spent in certain locations) and online activities (time of use, use of certain words, changes in search frequencies and length of queries).
conclusionMachine learning methods show promise in the prediction of prognosis (specifically functioning, relapse and remission) of mental disorders based on relevant collected variables. Future machine learning studies may want to focus on the inclusion of a broader swathe of variables including ecological momentary assessments, with a greater amount of good quality big data covering longer longitudinal illness courses and coupled with external validation of study findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The review was registered on PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023441108.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.