ArticleScientific reports2025
S100P is a core gene for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of sepsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening for candidate genes and cell populations associated with atherosclerotic calcification using single-cell RNA sequencing.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, characterized as a severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome, typically originates from an exaggerated immune response to infection that gives rise to organ dysfunction. Serving as one of the predominant causes of death among critically ill patients, it's pressing to acquire an in-depth understanding of its intricate pathological mechanisms to strengthen diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. By integrating genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data across multiple biological levels, multi-omics research analysis has emerged as a crucial tool for unveiling the complex interactions within biological systems and unraveling disease mechanisms in recent years. Samples were collected from 23 cases of sepsis patients and 10 healthy volunteers from January 2019 to December 2020. The protein components in the samples were explored by independent data acquisition (DIA) analysis method, while Circular RNA (circRNA) categories were usually identified by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technology. Subsequent to the above steps, data quality monitoring was performed by employing software, and unqualified sequences were excluded, and conditions were set for differential expression network analysis (protein group and circRNA group were separately used log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.