ArticleThoracic cancer2025
A Comprehensive Analysis of FGF/FGFR Signaling Alteration in NSCLC: Implications in Prognosis and Microenvironment.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of FGFR signaling in SCLC and NSCLC: Current insights and therapeutic perspectives.iScience · 2026Review
- TTF-1 and p40 co-expression defines a distinct subtype of non-small cell lung cancer with frequentTranslational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) ligands and their receptor have been identified as the potent target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinicopathological and microenvironmental characteristics of FGF/FGFR in NSCLC remain poorly elucidated. Here, we summarize 4656 NSCLCs and analyze clinicopathological features in 478 FGF/FGFR altered cases. AI analysis and multiplex immunofluorescence staining are used to reveal microenvironment features. First, around 10.27% NSCLC carry FGF/FGFR variant. Squamous cell carcinoma (41.95%) is much more than adenocarcinoma (8.32%). In 118 pathogenic variant (PV) cases, the most frequent variant is FGF/FGFR copy number increase (83.05%), the second is FGFR gene fusion (11.86%). Surprisingly, CCND1 always co-amplifies with FGF19 (100.00%). Furthermore, FGF PV is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes (overall survival: HR = 3.781, disease-free survival: HR = 3.340). And one-third of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion cases show clear cytoplasm in histology. Either CCND1/FGF19 co-amplification or KRAS co-mutation is closely related to cigarette exposure, and KRAS co-mutation acts as an independent factor of poor prognosis. Finally, the FGF/FGFR1/NOTCH1 within RB1 variant group has a remarkably high ratio of inner-tumor CD8+ T cell infiltration, non-exhausted T cells, exhausted T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.