ReviewBiomolecules2025
The Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Disease.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA/RNA Methylation-Driven Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Emerging Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities for Heart Failure in Diabetes.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia ratio in coronary microvascular dysfunction among chronic coronary syndrome patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for coronary microvascular disease: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in pregnancy: time to pay closer attention?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Natural Compounds Targeting Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Mechanisms and Beyond.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) comprises a spectrum of conditions characterized by the functional and structural abnormalities of coronary microcirculation, affecting vessels typically smaller than 500 μm. Despite its clinical significance as a contributor to myocardial ischemia, CMD frequently remains underdiagnosed due to the limitations of current diagnostic approaches. Invasive testing, including coronary reactivity assessment, is considered the gold standard, but it is resource-intensive and not always accessible. Non-invasive methods, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE), offer alternatives but are limited by varying accuracy and accessibility. Amid these diagnostic challenges, there is increasing interest in circulating biomarkers as adjuncts in CMD evaluation. Biomarkers associated with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress, detectable through routine blood tests, may assist in CMD diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic monitoring. These biomarkers can offer insights into CMD pathogenesis and enable early, non-invasive screening to identify patients who may benefit from more invasive investigations. This narrative review examines studies assessing biomarkers in CMD patients with diagnoses confirmed through invasive techniques. Our objective is to focus on circulating biomarkers linked to the invasive evaluation of coronary microcirculation, aiming to advance the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this prevalent condition and enhance diagnostic accuracy and the clinical management of affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.