ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Open Microfluidic Cell Culture in Hydrogels Enabled by 3D-Printed Molds.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Collagen Type I as a Biological Barrier Interface in Biomimetic Microfluidic Devices: Properties, Applications, and Challenges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell culture models with tissue-mimicking architecture enable thein vitro investigation of cellular behavior and cell-cell interactions. These models can recapitulate the structure and function of physiological systems and can be leveraged to elucidate mechanisms of disease. In this work, we developed a method to create open microfluidic cell cultures in vitro using 3D-printed molds. The method improves sample accessibility, is simpler to manufacture than traditional closed microfluidic cell culture systems and requires minimal specialized equipment, making it an attractive method for cell culture applications. Further, these molds can generate multiple tissue-mimicking structures in various hydrogels, including blood vessel mimics using endothelial cells (HUVECs). Various geometries were patterned into agarose, gelatin, and collagen type I hydrogels, including star-shaped wells, square wells, round wells, and open channels, to demonstrate the versatility of the approach. Open channels were created in collagen with diameters ranging from 400 µm to 4 mm and in multiple collagen densities ranging from 2 mg/mL to 4 mg/mL. To demonstrate the applicability of our approach for tissue modeling, blood vessel mimics were generated in open channels with diameters of 800 µm and 2 mm, with high cell viability (>89%) for both dimensions. The vessel mimics were used to study the effects of hypoxia on cell viability and CD31 expression by subjecting them to a reduced-O2 environment (∼16% O2). As compared to normoxia conditions, vessel mimics under hypoxia had a reduction in cell viability by 8.3% and CD31 surface expression by 7.4%. Overall, our method enables the generation of different geometries in hydrogels and the development of in vitro tissue mimics for biological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.