ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Regional Gene Therapy for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Current Concepts Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyaluronic acid as a biomaterial for dental pulp regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Recent advances in biomaterials for osteosarcoma treatment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Modern Approaches and Emerging Biological Therapies to Treat Fracture Nonunion.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Knockdown of IER3 Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of segmental bone defects presents a complex reconstruction challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Current treatment options are limited by efficacy across the spectrum of injury, morbidity, and cost. Regional gene therapy is a promising tissue engineering strategy for bone repair, as it allows for local implantation of nucleic acids or genetically modified cells to direct specific protein expression. In cell-based gene therapy approaches, a variety of different cell types have been described including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from multiple sources-bone marrow, adipose, skeletal muscle, and umbilical cord tissue, among others. MSCs, in particular, have been well studied, as they serve as a source of osteoprogenitor cells in addition to providing a vehicle for transgene delivery. Furthermore, MSCs possess immunomodulatory properties, which may support the development of an allogeneic "off-the-shelf" gene therapy product. Identifying an optimal cell type is paramount to the successful clinical translation of cell-based gene therapy approaches. Here, we review current strategies for the management of segmental bone loss in orthopedic surgery, including bone grafting, bone graft substitutes, and operative techniques. We also highlight regional gene therapy as a tissue engineering strategy for bone repair, with a focus on cell types and cell sources suitable for this application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.