Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40001651›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Improved Confidence-Interval Estimations Using Uncertainty Measure and Weighted Feature Decisions for Cuff-Less Blood-Pressure Measurements.

Soojeong Lee, Mugahed A Al-Antari, Gyanendra Prasad Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soojeong LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
Mugahed A Al-AntariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-4407
Gyanendra Prasad JoshiDepartment of AI Software, Kangwon National University, Kangwon State, Samcheok 10587, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-288X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a method to improve confidence-interval (CI) estimation using individual uncertainty measures and weighted feature decisions for cuff-less blood-pressure (BP) measurement. We obtained uncertainty using Gaussian process regression (GPR). The CI obtained from the GPR model is computed using the distribution of BP estimates, which provides relatively wide CIs. Thus, we proposed a method to obtain improved CIs for individual subjects by applying bootstrap and uncertainty methods using the cuff-less BP estimates of each subject obtained through GPR. This study also introduced a novel method to estimate cuff-less BP with high fidelity by determining highly weighted features using weighted feature decisions. The standard deviation of the proposed method's mean error is 2.94 mmHg and 1.50 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and (DBP), respectively. The mean absolute error results were obtained by weighted feature determination combining GPR and gradient boosting algorithms (GBA) for SBP (1.46 mmHg) and DBP (0.69 mmHg). The study confirmed that the BP estimates were within the CI based on the test samples of almost all subjects. The weighted feature decisions combining GPR and GBA were more accurate and reliable for cuff-less BP estimation.

Indexed as

confidence intervalscuff-less blood-pressure estimationGaussian processes regressiongradient boosting algorithmuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40001651
PMCPMC11852306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.