ArticleBiology2025
Sequence-Only Prediction of Super-Enhancers in Human Cell Lines Using Transformer Models.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Research for Complex Biological Systems: Integrating Data, Models, and Biological Knowledge.Biology · 2026Article
- SEA version 4.0: a major expansion and update of the Super-Enhancer Archive.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study discloses the application of transformer-based deep learning models for the task of super-enhancers prediction in human tumor cell lines with a specific focus on sequence-only features within studied entities of super-enhancer and enhancer elements in the human genome. The proposed SE-prediction method included the GENA-LM application at handling long DNA sequences with the classification task, distinguishing super-enhancers from enhancers using H3K36me, H3K4me1, H3K4me3 and H3K27ac landscape datasets from HeLa, HEK293, H2171, Jurkat, K562, MM1S and U87 cell lines. The model was fine-tuned on relevant sequence data, allowing for the analysis of extended genomic sequences without the need for epigenetic markers as proposed in early approaches. The study achieved balanced accuracy metrics, surpassing previous models like SENet, particularly in HEK293 and K562 cell lines. Also, it was shown that super-enhancers frequently co-localize with epigenetic marks such as H3K4me3 and H3K27ac. Therefore, the attention mechanism of the model provided insights into the sequence features contributing to SE classification, indicating a correlation between sequence-only features and mentioned epigenetic landscapes. These findings support the potential transformer models use in further genomic sequence analysis for bioinformatics applications in enhancer/super-enhancer characterization and gene regulation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.