Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002013›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Muscle Characteristics Comparison Analysis Reveal Differences in the Meat Quality and Nutritional Components of Three Shanghai Local Pig Breeds.

Weilong Tu, Hongyang Wang, Yingying Zhang, Wei Jiang, Chuan He, Ji Huang, Lan Bai, Yuduan Diao, Jieke Zhou, Yongsong Tan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weilong TuKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Hongyang WangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Yingying ZhangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Wei JiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Genetics and Breeding, Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Agricultural Biosecurity Evaluation and Testing Professional Technical Service Platform, Crop Ecological Environment Safety Inspection and Testing Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Chuan HeKey Laboratory of Agricultural Genetics and Breeding, Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Agricultural Biosecurity Evaluation and Testing Professional Technical Service Platform, Crop Ecological Environment Safety Inspection and Testing Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3485-8246
Ji HuangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Lan BaiKey Laboratory of Agricultural Genetics and Breeding, Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Agricultural Biosecurity Evaluation and Testing Professional Technical Service Platform, Crop Ecological Environment Safety Inspection and Testing Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Yuduan DiaoKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Jieke ZhouKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Yongsong TanKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.
Xiao WuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Genetics and Breeding, Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai Agricultural Biosecurity Evaluation and Testing Professional Technical Service Platform, Crop Ecological Environment Safety Inspection and Testing Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China.

Funding

Shanghai Key Project on Agricultural Development 2021-02-08-00-12-F00768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the differences in meat quality and nutritional components between the local Shanghai pig breeds Meishan pig (MS), Shawutou pig (SWT), Fengjing pig (FJ), and the commercial Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire (DLY) crossbred pigs, and to provide data support for the selection and breeding of superior pig breeds, this study selected 30 piglets each of three local pig breeds and DLY with similar birth ages and weights around 25 kg, fed them the same daily ration with uniform nutritional components, and slaughtered ten of them at around 100 kg weight for evaluation of differences in meat quality indicators (primarily intramuscular fat content, tenderness value, texture, etc.) and amino acid content among the varieties. The results indicated significant differences among the four pig breeds in intramuscular fat content, with MS having the highest content and significant differences in tenderness value compared to the other three breeds (

Indexed as

amino acidsflavored nucleotidelocal pig breedsmeat quality traitstexture

Identifiers

PMID40002013
PMCPMC11854645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.