Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002194›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Multimodal Imaging of Osteosarcoma: From First Diagnosis to Radiomics.

Maurizio Cè, Michaela Cellina, Thirapapha Ueanukul, Gianpaolo Carrafiello, Rawee Manatrakul, Phatthawit Tangkittithaworn, Suphaneewan Jaovisidha, Praman Fuangfa, Donald Resnick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Intraosseous tumours of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine Learning Models Derived from [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maurizio CèPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Michaela CellinaRadiology Department, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Piazza Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-1971
Thirapapha UeanukulDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Rawee ManatrakulDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Phatthawit TangkittithawornDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Suphaneewan JaovisidhaDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Praman FuangfaDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Donald ResnickDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor characterized by the production of an osteoid matrix. Although histology remains the definitive diagnostic standard, imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, therapeutic planning, and follow-up. Conventional radiography serves as the initial checkpoint for detecting this pathology, which often presents diagnostic challenges due to vague and nonspecific symptoms, especially in its early stages. Today, the integration of different imaging techniques enables an increasingly personalized diagnosis and management, with each contributing unique and complementary information. Conventional radiography typically initiates the imaging assessment, and the Bone Reporting and Data System (Bone-RADS) of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) is a valuable tool for stratifying the risk of suspicious bone lesions. CT is the preferred modality for evaluating the bone matrix, while bone scans and PET/CT are effective for detecting distant metastases. MRI reveals the extent of the lesion in adjacent soft tissues, the medullary canal, and joints, as well as its relationship to neurovascular structures and the presence of skip lesions. Advanced techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perfusion MRI help characterize the tumor environment and assess treatment response. Osteosarcoma comprises a range of subtypes with differing clinical and imaging characteristics, some of which are particularly distinctive, such as in the case of telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Knowledge of these variants can guide radiologists in the differential diagnosis, which includes both central and surface forms, ranging from highly aggressive to more indolent types. In this review, we present a wide range of representative cases from our hospital case series to illustrate both typical and atypical imaging presentations. Finally, we discuss recent advancements and challenges in applying artificial intelligence approaches to the imaging of osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebone cancerBone-RADSmultimodal imagingosteosarcomaprimary malignant bone tumor

Identifiers

PMID40002194
PMCPMC11852380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.