Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40002833›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xiao Chun Ling, Henry Shen-Lih Chen, Po-Han Yeh, Yu-Chun Cheng, Chu-Yen Huang, Su-Chin Shen, Yung-Sung Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma Detection and Progression.Advances in ophthalmology and optometry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao Chun LingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-8959
Henry Shen-Lih ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Po-Han YehDepartment of Ophthalmology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei 236, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Chu-Yen HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Su-Chin ShenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Yung-Sung LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3103-5807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnosisfundus photographyglaucomaoptical coherence tomographyprogression

Identifiers

PMID40002833
PMCPMC11852503

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.