ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Decade of Progress in Ultrasound Assessments of Subcutaneous and Total Body Fat: A Scoping Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasonographic Quantification of Reduction in Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Following Large-Volume Liposuction.Cureus · 2026Article
- New Proposal in the Approach to Brachial Remodeling: The Melfa-Anastasia Arm Laxity System (MAALS).Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Association of Vitamin D Deficiency with Local Muscle-Fat Ratio in Geriatric Palliative Care Patients: An Ultrasonographic Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body composition assessment by ultrasonography is a vivid research field. Ultrasound (US) can be used to quantify subcutaneous and visceral fat, to evaluate the quantity and quality of skeletal muscle, and to infer intracellular fat content. This scoping review aimed to summarize recent advancements in subcutaneous fat estimation using US and related applications. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science to identify original articles published in English between 1 January 2014 and 20 December 2024. A total of 1869 articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts, and 283 were retrieved for full-text evaluation. Our search and selection strategy resulted in 89 eligible documents. The literature discussed in this review suggests that US is a reliable and valid technique for measuring subcutaneous fat thickness at selected anatomic locations. Standardized measurement protocols enabled accurate subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) patterning in various populations (e.g., athletes, children, adults, and patients with anorexia nervosa). Further research is warranted to establish clinically relevant cutoff values. US-derived SAT thicknesses can also provide whole-body fat estimates of fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and body fat percentage (%BF). To this end, prediction formulas were developed to ensure agreement with criterion measures given by laboratory techniques, or multicompartment models based on combinations thereof. The resulting assessments of global adiposity were reliable but inaccurate in certain populations (e.g., overweight and obese). Nevertheless, due to its high reliability, US might be used to track changes in body fat content during nutritional and/or lifestyle interventions. Future investigations will be needed to evaluate its accuracy in this respect and to improve the validity of whole-body fat estimation compared to multicompartment models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.