ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Cardio Training for Weight Loss in Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agreement of Over-the-Counter Continuous Glucose Monitors With Capillary-Meter Glucose in Young Adults Without Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Article
- Acute effects of high-intensity interval training on adiponectin isoforms in inactive young adults: a quasi-experimental study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Effects of a Moderate-Intensity Interval Training Protocol on University Students' Body Composition: A Pilot Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Pushing the limits: does suprahigh-intensity interval training open a new frontier in pulmonary rehabilitation?ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Mitigating High-Fat Diet-Induced Damage in Rat Testicular Tissue.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.