Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004914›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes.

Maria-Bianca Anca-Stanciu, Andrei Manu, Maria Victoria Olinca, Cătălin Coroleucă, Diana-Elena Comandașu, Ciprian Andrei Coroleuca, Calina Maier, Elvira Bratila

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deciphering survival disparities in endometrial cancer: a focus on mismatch repair pathway integrity (systematic review and meta-analysis).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria-Bianca Anca-StanciuDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei ManuDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Maria Victoria OlincaDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2891-1941
Cătălin CoroleucăPanait Sirbu Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital Bucharest, 060251 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-0663
Diana-Elena ComandașuDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ciprian Andrei CoroleucaDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Calina MaierDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Elvira BratilaDepartment of Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with rising incidence due to aging populations and obesity-related factors. This review explores the evolving molecular and FIGO classifications of EC, highlighting their significance in diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment strategies. Molecular subtyping based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification offers a more precise understanding of EC, dividing it into POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), copy-number low (CNL), and copy-number high (CNH) subtypes. Each subgroup has distinct genetic, histological, and prognostic characteristics. Recent updates to the FIGO staging system incorporate molecular features, allowing for more tailored treatment approaches. Advances in immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and novel therapeutic combinations have reshaped clinical management. This review emphasizes the integration of molecular diagnostics into routine practice, outlining challenges and future perspectives in managing EC for improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

copy-number high (CNH)copy-number low (CNL)endometrial cancerFIGO classificationimmunotherapymicrosatellite instability-high (MSI-H)molecular classificationpersonalized medicinePOLE ultramutatedtargeted therapiesThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

Identifiers

PMID40004914
PMCPMC11856752

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.