Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006024›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Trends in Clinical Trials of Prodrugs.

Diogo Boreski, Valentine Fabienne Schmid, Priscila Longhin Bosquesi, Jean Leandro Dos Santos, Cauê Benito Scarim, Viktor Reshetnikov, Chung Man Chin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Diagnosis and management of cold agglutinin disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diogo BoreskiLaboratory for Drug Design (LAPDESF), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-4735
Valentine Fabienne SchmidDepartement Pharmazeutische Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Basel, 4003 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-8372-3320
Priscila Longhin BosquesiLaboratory for Drug Design (LAPDESF), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil.
Jean Leandro Dos SantosLaboratory for Drug Design (LAPDESF), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-2829
Cauê Benito ScarimLaboratory for Drug Design (LAPDESF), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2540-6395
Viktor ReshetnikovDepartment Chemistry and Pharmacy, Organic Chemistry II, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestrasse 42, 91301 Erlangen, Germany.
Chung Man ChinLaboratory for Drug Design (LAPDESF), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4141-0455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new drugs is a lengthy and complex process regarding its conception and ideation, passing through in silico studies, synthesis, in vivo studies, clinical trials, approval, and commercialization, with an exceptionally low success rate. The lack of efficacy, safety, and suboptimal pharmacokinetic parameters are commonly identified as significant challenges in the discovery of new drugs. To help address these challenges, various approaches have been explored in medicinal chemistry, including the use of prodrug strategies. As a well-established approach, prodrug design remains the best option for improving physicochemical properties, reducing toxicity, and increasing selectivity, all while minimizing costs and saving on biological studies. This review article aims to analyze the current advances using the prodrug approach that has allowed the advance of drug candidates to clinical trials in the last 10 years. The approaches presented here aim to inspire further molecular optimization processes and highlight the potential of this strategy to facilitate the advancement of new compounds to clinical study phases.

Indexed as

clinical trialsdrug discoveryprodrug designprodrugs

Identifiers

PMID40006024
PMCPMC11859331

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.