Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007263›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

A Novel Approach to Assess the Predictiveness of a Continuous Biomarker in Early Phases of Drug Development.

Alessandra Serra, Julia Geronimi, Sandrine Guilleminot, Hugo Hadjur, Marie-Karelle Riviere, Gaëlle Saint-Hilary, Pavel Mozgunov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra SerraUniversity of Cambridge, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8431-5154
Julia GeronimiInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Sandrine GuilleminotInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hugo HadjurDepartment of Statistical Methodology, Saryga, Tournus, France.
Marie-Karelle RiviereDepartment of Statistical Methodology, Saryga, Tournus, France.
Gaëlle Saint-HilaryDepartment of Statistical Methodology, Saryga, Tournus, France.
Pavel MozgunovUniversity of Cambridge, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-0284

Funding

Medical Research Council MC UU00040/03National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying and quantifying predictive biomarkers is a critical issue of personalized medicine approaches and patient-centric clinical development strategies. In early stages of the development process, significant challenges and numerous uncertainties arise. One of the challenges is the ability to assess the predictive value of a biomarker, i.e., the difference in primary outcomes between experimental and placebo arms above and below a certain threshold of the biomarker. Indeed, when the accumulated information is very limited and the sample size is small, preliminary conclusions about the predictive properties of the biomarker might be misleading. To date, the majority of investigations regarding the predictiveness of biomarkers were in the setting of moderate-to-large sample sizes. In this work, we propose a novel flexible approach inspired by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distance in order to assess the predictiveness of a continuous biomarker in a clinical setting where the sample size is small. Via simulations we show that the proposed method allows to achieve a higher power to declare predictiveness compared to the existing methods under a range of scenarios, whilst still maintaining a control of the type I error at a pre-specified level.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDrug DevelopmentComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsSample SizeStatistics, NonparametricBiomarkerscontinuous biomarkerearly phasepersonalized medicinepredictive

Identifiers

PMID40007263
PMCPMC11862805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.