ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
A Novel Approach to Assess the Predictiveness of a Continuous Biomarker in Early Phases of Drug Development.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turning precision medicine into reality with statistics and data-driven decision making across pharmaceutical development.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Adaptive Biomarker-Based Design for Early Phase Clinical Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying and quantifying predictive biomarkers is a critical issue of personalized medicine approaches and patient-centric clinical development strategies. In early stages of the development process, significant challenges and numerous uncertainties arise. One of the challenges is the ability to assess the predictive value of a biomarker, i.e., the difference in primary outcomes between experimental and placebo arms above and below a certain threshold of the biomarker. Indeed, when the accumulated information is very limited and the sample size is small, preliminary conclusions about the predictive properties of the biomarker might be misleading. To date, the majority of investigations regarding the predictiveness of biomarkers were in the setting of moderate-to-large sample sizes. In this work, we propose a novel flexible approach inspired by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distance in order to assess the predictiveness of a continuous biomarker in a clinical setting where the sample size is small. Via simulations we show that the proposed method allows to achieve a higher power to declare predictiveness compared to the existing methods under a range of scenarios, whilst still maintaining a control of the type I error at a pre-specified level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.