ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Pediatric endoscopic retrograde pancreatography expertise in chronic pancreatitis: a single-center analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Frey Procedure in the Treatment of Pediatric Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic biliary drainage outperforms conventional external drainage in pediatric choledochal cyst with severe cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) in children has exhibited an annual increase in incidence in recent years. Pediatric CP presents unique clinical features compared to adult cases. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) serves as a valuable and safe tool for diagnosing and treating CP in adults. However, data on endoscopic treatment of CP in children are still limited. Methods: Demographics, etiology, surgical indications, diagnosis, treatment details, associated complications, and follow-up information were retrospectively studied in consecutive patients (<18 years old) who underwent ERP for CP between January 2020 and October 2024. Results: A total of 17 children (7 male, 10 female) with a mean age of 10.0 ± 2.7 years were included in the study. A total of 34 endoscopic treatments were conducted. Recurrent abdominal pain was the primary clinical symptom. Imaging predominantly revealed pancreatic duct abnormalities such as tortuous dilatation and the presence of pancreatic duct stones. Notably, 41.2% (7 cases) involved genetic and congenital anatomical variations. Pancreatic duct stent placement was successfully performed in all 17 children (100.0% success rate). Stent replacements occurred on average 2.2 times (range 1-5) at intervals of 3-6 months. Postoperative pancreatitis developed in 2 cases (5.9%, 2/34), and hyperamylasemia occurred in 5 cases (14.7%, 5/34). The postprocedure visual analogue scale (VAS) score for abdominal pain significantly decreased from 6 to 1 ( Conclusions: ERP performed by trained endoscopists utilizing standard adult endoscopes and accessories proved a safe and effective treatment option for pediatric CP, with complication rates comparable to those reported in adult cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.