Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40008078›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders2025

Lung Ultrasound for Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: Relationship With High-Resolution Computed Tomography and Nailfold Capillaroscopy.

Rahma A Elziaty, Alaa A Aboelyazeed, Sherif Na Hegazy, Ahmed A Khalifa, Salma A Khalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rahma A ElziatyDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Alaa A AboelyazeedDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sherif Na HegazyDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed A KhalifaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Salma A KhalilDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-5904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been recently proposed as a convenient and radiation-free imaging modality for the evaluation of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease. Objectives: The current study evaluates the relation between LUS and both high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and capillaroscopy findings in patients with systemic sclerosis. Design: This cross-sectional study included 32 patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: Besides clinical evaluation, all participants underwent LUS, HRCT, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and nailfold video-capillaroscopy (NVC). All participants' data were compared and correlated. Results: There is an excellent agreement between number of B-lines and HRCT score (interclass correlation = 0.864, Conclusion: The number of B-lines parallels the HRCT score and the extent of digital vascular damage as indicated by NVC and clinical digital ulcers. Lung ultrasound has proven to be a reliable radiation-free modality for screening of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease and detecting its extent.

Indexed as

B-linescapillaroscopyhigh-resolution CTinterstitial lung diseaseLung ultrasoundsystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID40008078
PMCPMC11848898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.