ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
A cross-sectional study on white matter hyperitensity in patients at the initial diagnosis of neuropsychiatric SLE: Correlation with Clinical and Laboratory Findings.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the differences between neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) patients with and without white matter hyperintensity (WMH) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify factors independently associated with the development of WMH in NPSLE.
methodA comparative analysis was conducted on 84 NPSLE patients hospitalized at Peking University People's Hospital from 2015 to 2022 at the initial diagnosis of NPSLE. Patients were categorized based on the presence of WMH on brain MRI scans. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were reviewed and statistically analyzed.
resultsThe study included 84 NPSLE patients, 50% exhibiting WMH (NPSLE-WMH +). At the initial diagnosis of NPSLE, the NPSLE-WMH + group showed significantly higher levels of antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA), anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA), and lower serum C3 levels. The proportion of patients with reduced WBC, elevated anti-dsDNA, elevated ANuA, elevated anticardiolipin antibody (ACA), positive urinary protein (UPR), and positive ANA was higher in the NPSLE-WMH + group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that positive UPR (p = 0.040), positive ANA (p = 0.025), elevated anti-dsDNA (0.047), and elevated ACA (p = 0.025) were potentially independent factors associated with WMH development in NPSLE patients.
conclusionsThis study provides novel insights into the clinical and laboratory differences between NPSLE patients with and without WMH, identifying specific independently associated factors for WMH development. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of this intricate disease. Key Points • Although WMH is one of the most frequently observed lesions on MRI in patients with NPSLE, previous literature has given limited attention to it. This study focuses on the differences between NPSLE patients with and without WMH, unveiling independently associated factors for developing WMH in this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40009312What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.