Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009377›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Outcomes Following a Mental Health Care Intervention for Children in the Emergency Department: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Amanda S Newton, Jennifer Thull-Freedman, Jianling Xie, Teresa Lightbody, Jennifer Woods, Antonia Stang, Kathleen Winston, Jacinda Larson, Bruce Wright, Michael Stubbs and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04292379 (An Innovative Model of Pediatric Acute Mental Health and Addictions Care to Increase Value to Children,Youth, and the Healthcare System), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04292379 nacompletednot on this map

An Innovative Model of Pediatric Acute Mental Health and Addictions Care to Increase Value to Children,Youth, and the Healthcare System

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled1,992ConditionsMental Health, Mental Disorders, Pediatrics, Emergency PsychiatricArmsStandard care, Care Bundle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amanda S NewtonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer Thull-FreedmanDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jianling XieDepartments of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Teresa LightbodyChildren, Youth, and Families-Addictions and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer WoodsUniversity of Alberta Hospital and Stollery Children's Hospital Emergency Departments, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Antonia StangDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kathleen WinstonDepartments of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jacinda LarsonAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bruce WrightDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Michael StubbsDepartment of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthew MorrissetteDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen B FreedmanDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The emergency department (ED) is an important safety net for children experiencing mental and behavioral health crises and can serve as a navigational hub for families seeking support for these concerns. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of a novel mental health care bundle on child well-being, satisfaction with care, and health system metrics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Nonrandomized trial of 2 pediatric EDs in Alberta, Canada. Children younger than 18 years with mental and behavioral health presentations were enrolled before implementation (preimplementation: January 2020 to January 2021), at implementation onset (run-in: February 2021 to June 2021), and during bundle delivery (implementation: July 2021 to June 2022). Intervention: The bundle involved risk stratification, standardized mental health assessments, and provision of an urgent follow-up appointment after the visit, if required. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, child well-being 30 days after the ED visit, was assessed using the Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (children aged <14 years) or Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (children aged 14-17 years). Change in well-being between the preimplementation and implementation periods was examined using interrupted time-series analysis and multivariable modeling. Changes in health system metrics (hospitalization, ED length of stay [LOS], and revisits) and care satisfaction were also examined. Results: A total of 1412 patients (median [IQR] age, 13 [11-15] years), with 715 enrolled preimplementation (390 [54.5%] female; 55 [7.7%] First Nations, Inuit, or Métis; 46 [6.4%] South, Southcentral, or Southeast Asian; and 501 [70.1%] White) and 697 enrolled at implementation (357 [51.2%] female; 51 [7.3%] First Nations, Inuit, or Métis; 39 [5.6%] South, Southcentral, or Southeast Asian; and 511 [73.3%] White) were included in the analysis. There were no differences between study periods in well-being. Reduced well-being z scores were associated with mood disorder diagnosis (standardized mean difference, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.02) and nonbinary gender identity (standardized mean difference, -0.41; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.19). The implementation period involved fewer hospitalizations (difference in hospitalizations, -6.9; 95% CI, -10.4 to -3.4) and longer ED LOS (1.1 hours; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.4 hours). There were no differences between study periods in ED revisits or care satisfaction. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the delivery of a care bundle was not associated with higher child well-being 30 days after an ED visit. Hospitalizations did decrease during bundle delivery, but ED LOS did not. These health system findings may have been affected by broader changes in patient volumes and flow processes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, which took place as the study was conducted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04292379.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentAlbertaChildFemaleHumansMalePatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40009377
PMCPMC11866027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.