Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009384›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Ultrasound Neuromodulation With Transcranial Pulse Stimulation in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Eva Matt, Michael Mitterwallner, Sonja Radjenovic, Daria Grigoryeva, Alexandra Weber, Elisabeth Stögmann, Alina Domitner, Anna Zettl, Sarah Osou, Roland Beisteiner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03770182 (Brain Stimulation for Neurological Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03770182 nacompletednot on this map

Brain Stimulation for Neurological Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorStorz Medical AGRan2017 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsNEUROLITH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Focused and unfocused transcranial ultrasound stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transcranial Pulse Stimulation Enhances Dexterity in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Fiber photometry-based analysis of transcranial magneto-acoustic electrical stimulation effects on synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1 region of APP/PS1 mice].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva MattFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael MitterwallnerFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sonja RadjenovicFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daria GrigoryevaFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra WeberFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth StögmannMemory Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alina DomitnerFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anna ZettlFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah OsouFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland BeisteinerFunctional Brain Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Given the increasing prevalence of dementia and the limited treatment options available, ultrasound neuromodulation could serve as a novel add-on therapy to standard treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD). As ultrasound neuromodulation is still in its early stages, further research is essential to fully explore its potential in treating brain disorders. Objective: To evaluate clinical and functional imaging effects of transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) in patients with AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna between January 1, 2017, and July 27, 2022. Sixty patients with clinically diagnosed AD receiving state-of-the-art treatment were randomly allocated to treatment sequence groups verum-sham (first cycle verum, second cycle sham, n = 30) and sham-verum (n = 30). Data analysis was performed from July 28, 2022, to September 5, 2024. Intervention: Each participant received 6 verum and 6 sham TPS sessions (6000 pulses, 0.20 mJ/mm2, 5 Hz) to frontoparietal brain areas. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neuropsychological tests, including the primary outcome Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) corrected total score (CTS), were performed at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months following the stimulations in each cycle. Primary and secondary outcomes, including functional magnetic resonance imaging and Beck Depression Inventory-II, were analyzed by intention-to-treat analysis and, for sensitivity, by per protocol analysis. Results: For the intention-to-treat analysis, 60 patients between ages 51 and 82 years (mean [SD], 70.65 [8.16] years; 30 females; 30 males) were included. The CERAD CTS increased by a mean (SD) of 2.22 (6.87) points in the verum condition from 70.93 (14.27) points at baseline to 73.15 (14.90) 3 months after stimulation, while the mean (SD) score in the sham condition increased by 1.00 (6.82) point vs baseline from 71.68 (13.62] at baseline to 72.68 (14.48) 3 months after stimulation. Primary data analysis of the condition × session interaction was not significant (P = .68; partial η2 [ηp2] = 0.01), but its interaction with age was P = .003; ηp2 = 0.08, followed by post hoc analyses of age subsamples. Although several patients older than 70 years benefited from verum TPS, only the younger subgroup (≤70 years) showed significantly higher CTS increases for verum in all poststimulation sessions (condition × session: P = .005; ηp2 = 0.16). At 3 months after stimulation, for example, a mean (SD) 3.91 (7.86)-point increase was found for verum TPS in the younger patients, but a mean (SD) CTS decrease of 1.83 (5.80) was observed for sham. Memory-associated brain activation was significantly higher after verum TPS in the precuneus, visual, and frontal areas, while resting state functional connectivity was significantly upregulated in the dorsal attention network. In the per protocol sample, a significant reduction of the Beck Depression Inventory-II scores 3 months following verum TPS was found (verum baseline: 7.27 [5.87]; verum 3 months after stimulation: 5.27 [5.27]; sham baseline: 6.70 [5.65]; sham 3 months after stimulation: 6.22 [4.40]; P = .008; ηp2 = 0.23). During both verum and sham conditions, the most common observed adverse symptom was depression; no major neuropathologic change was detected in the patients by detailed neuroradiologic assessments. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of TPS in patients with AD, a 2-week verum treatment improved cognitive scores in the younger subgroup, ameliorated depressive symptoms, and induced upregulation of functional brain activation and connectivity. These findings suggest TPS may be a safe and promising add-on therapy for patients with AD receiving state-of-the-art treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03770182.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUltrasonic TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40009384
PMCPMC11866033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.