ArticleScientific reports2025
Early attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with NeuroDCT-ICA and rhinofish optimization (RFO) algorithm based optimized ADHD-AttentionNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI driven automation for enhancing sustainability efforts in CDP report analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GNNs surpass transformers in tumor medical image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence with ensemble of deep learning model for dementia prediction to enhance clinical decision support systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research on multi-UAV autonomous obstacle avoidance algorithm integrating improved dynamic window approach and ORCA.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced anomaly network intrusion detection using an improved snow ablation optimizer with dimensionality reduction and hybrid deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ADHD detector analyzes behavioral, cognitive, or physiological data (e.g., EEG, eye-tracking, or surveys) to identify patterns associated with ADHD symptoms. This work offers a more sophisticated method of detecting ADHD by overcoming the main drawbacks of existing approaches in terms of data processing, detection accuracy, and computational time. The work is inspired by the fact that Deep Learning (DL) frameworks could transform the existing detection systems of ADHD. In the proposed framework, there is a new NeuroDCT-ICA module for the preprocessing of raw EEG data, which guarantees the elimination of noise and extraction of informative features. Moreover, the method introduces a novel RhinoFish Optimization (RFO) algorithm for selecting optimal features, which enhance the data processing capacity and the stability of the system. As a core of the approach, there is the ADHD-AttentionNet - the deep learning-based model aimed at improving the accuracy and confidence of ADHD identification. The model is validated with the standard metrics, and the performance of the model is outstanding as it has high accuracy of 98.52%, F-score of 98.26% and specificity of 98.16%. These outcomes show that the proposed model yields better accuracy in detecting ADHD related patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.