ArticleScientific reports2025
Flight testing of drone-delivered automated external defibrillators for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in suburban Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nighttime human-supervised drone-delivered automated external defibrillators: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods feasibility study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Deployment, dispatch, and delivery: a scoping review of drone-delivered AED for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Breaking the Chain of Survival: What Progetto Vita Tells Us, and What It Doesn't.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in a timely manner is critical for improving survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. However, in developing countries, logistical and infrastructural challenges often result in delays, particularly in suburban areas. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of using drones to deliver AEDs in suburban OHCA scenarios. A series of ninety test flights were conducted using a DJI Matrice 600 drone (DJI, China) to deliver a Philips HeartStart AED (Philips, Netherlands) across varying payloads. Bystanders in simulated OHCA situations identified their location via mobile applications, enabling the drone operator to dispatch the drone beyond the pilot's line of sight. The results showed a 97.7% success rate in AED delivery, with a median flight distance of 4042 m and a median response time of 7 min and 39 s. Despite payload variations, the drone maintained adequate speed and landing accuracy, with a mean speed of 9.17 m per second and a median landing error of 122 centimeters. The findings suggest that drones have significant potential for improving emergency medical responses in suburban areas of developing countries. Integration into emergency services could address current delays, though further research is necessary to optimize performance under varying conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.