ArticleGenome biology2025
Cross-species imputation and comparison of single-cell transcriptomic profiles.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference-guided pseudotime inference across species and biological contexts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unify learns cellular evolution with universal multimodal embeddings.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advancement of humanized mice and leading applications in immunological disease models.Inflammation and regeneration · 2026Review
- Patches: A Representation Learning Framework for Decoding Shared and Condition-Specific Transcriptional Programs in Wound Healing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deciphering the 3D genome organization across species from Hi-C data.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Integrating AI, Machine Learning, and Animal Models for Precision Oncology: Bridging Preclinical and Clinical Gaps.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Cross-species imputation and comparison of single-cell transcriptomic profiles.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-species comparison and prediction of gene expression profiles are important to understand regulatory changes during evolution and to transfer knowledge learned from model organisms to humans. Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) profiles enable us to capture gene expression profiles with respect to variations among individual cells; however, cross-species comparison of scRNA-seq profiles is challenging because of data sparsity, batch effects, and the lack of one-to-one cell matching across species. Moreover, single-cell profiles are challenging to obtain in certain biological contexts, limiting the scope of hypothesis generation. Here we developed Icebear, a neural network framework that decomposes single-cell measurements into factors representing cell identity, species, and batch factors. Icebear enables accurate prediction of single-cell gene expression profiles across species, thereby providing high-resolution cell type and disease profiles in under-characterized contexts. Icebear also facilitates direct cross-species comparison of single-cell expression profiles for conserved genes that are located on the X chromosome in eutherian mammals but on autosomes in chicken. This comparison, for the first time, revealed evolutionary and diverse adaptations of X-chromosome upregulation in mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.