SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Multicomponent Interventions for Adults With Cancer Cachexia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Adipose Tissue and Lipid Dysregulation Contributions to Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Function.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Combined Nutritional and Exercise Interventions for Cachexia in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Limited to Cancer Cachexia.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of hospice care plus estazolam on sleep and psychological distress in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: a real-world observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Symptom dynamics through multiphase treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Effects of Multicomponent Exercise on Pain and Biopsychosocial Outcomes in Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing the need for multimodal care in anorexia and cachexia patients with advanced cancer referred to palliative care: a secondary analysis of a multicenter survey in Japan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Physical Activity, Exerkines, and Their Role in Cancer Cachexia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Nutritional Support for Treatment Continuity and Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer cachexia has substantial impacts on people's quality of life. There is no current gold standard treatment, but the complex pathophysiology of cachexia suggests that a multitargeted and individualised treatment approach is needed. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which multicomponent interventions have targeted the key features of cachexia and been tailored to individuals, and differential effects on quality of life.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. We searched four databases, two clinical trial registers and MedRxiv on 20 June 2024. Intervention components were classified by intervention category (nutritional, exercise/physical activity, pharmacological and psychosocial), cachexia feature(s) targeted (reduced energy intake, altered metabolism, involuntary weight loss and decline in physical function) and level of tailoring. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life over time, as well as standardised mean differences between study arms, were calculated.
resultsSixty-two multicomponent interventions were included, of which two combined components from all four intervention categories, and nine targeted all four key features of cachexia. Eighteen multicomponent interventions were fully tailored and 30 were partly tailored to individuals. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life were calculated for thirteen studies; all had a high risk of bias or raised concerns. In eleven studies, quality of life scores improved following the intervention, whereas in two studies they declined. Standardised mean differences between study arms were calculated for four studies; in three, the intervention arm showed a greater improvement in quality of life scores than the usual care arm. Amongst these data, there was no indication that the number of cachexia features targeted, or the extent of tailoring, was associated with a greater improvement in quality of life scores; however, the heterogeneity prevented us from concluding on our hypothesis.
conclusionsThis review mapped out in detail the combinations of intervention categories used, the key features of cachexia targeted, and the extent of tailoring across multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. Only a small proportion of the multicomponent interventions targeted all four key features of cachexia, but most were either partly or fully tailored to individuals. Despite sixty-two multicomponent interventions being investigated, only four studies compared these to usual care and reported quality of life outcomes. High risk of bias, low sample sizes and variable outcome data remain challenges to the interpretability of results in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.