ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Lurasidone uses and dosages in Spain: RETROLUR, a real-world retrospective analysis using artificial intelligence.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing Treatment Strategies in the Bipolar Disorder Spectrum With Classical AI Approaches: Systematic Review of Performance, Bias, and Clinical Applicability.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Dealing with Early-Onset Schizophrenia and the Role of Lurasidone: An Expert Opinion.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lurasidone is used for schizophrenia and bipolar depression in many countries, yet there is a lack of existing literature about its use, efficacy, and safety in real life. We aimed to characterize lurasidone-treated patients by analyzing unstructured information in electronic health records (EHRs). Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational, and descriptive study that used data extracted from EHRs of patients initiating treatment with lurasidone in four Spanish hospitals from September 2019 to March 2022. Stratification included primary diagnosis, antipsychotic therapy, and lurasidone dose. Natural language processing and machine learning were used to extract and analyze unstructured clinical data using SNOMED CT terminology. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics, as well as symptoms and potential adverse events as efficacy and safety outcomes, were evaluated at inclusion and during follow-up. Results: Among 2,374,218 patients attending the participating hospitals during the study period with 66,523,391 EHRs, 272 initiated lurasidone and were included. Median (Q1; Q3) age was 46 (37; 56) years, and 60.3% were female. Common comorbidities were hypertension (46.7%), dyslipidemia (44.5%), and diabetes (30.5%), and 87.1% had received a median of three antipsychotics before lurasidone, being olanzapine (52.9%) and quetiapine (45.2%) the most frequently used. During follow-up, 16.9% of the patients discontinued lurasidone, and few patients (<1.2%) reached high doses (111 and 148 mg/day). Lurasidone demonstrated effectiveness in reducing positive and negative symptoms, anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation, with a marked reduction in most of the adverse events compared to the pre-lurasidone period. Discussion: Lurasidone reduced positive and negative symptoms frequencies with a favorable safety profile, while low discontinuation rates suggest efficacy-tolerability balance, patient satisfaction, and acceptability. Our data reflect that in Spain lurasidone is used at low doses, limiting its beneficial effects according to clinical trials results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.