ArticleDigital health
Preferences of community-dwelling older adults with multimorbidity for digital empowerment interventions: Protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The development of digital health technologies has had a positive impact on the management of comorbidity in the elderly. At the same time, it also sets certain requirements for the digital health literacy of older adults. To effectively implement interventions that improve digital health literacy among older adults with multimorbidity, it is essential to involve patients in decision-making processes and to develop interventions that align with their preferences. Methods and analysis: This study will use Discrete choice experiment to investigate the needs and preferences of older adults with multimorbidity for digital health literacy intervention. Attributes were identified through a literature review, in-depth interviews, and expert consultation. The attributes are intervention provider, content, type, frequency, material, learning mode, supplementary services, and cost. According to the identified attributes and levels, the choice set questionnaires were generated using Stata software. Furthermore, the study will assess the impact of demographic factors, social support, self-efficacy, levels of digital health literacy, and technology anxiety on the selection of preferences. A mixed logic model will analyze respondents'preferences for different intervention attributes and levels. A latent class model will identify heterogeneous group preferences. Results: We anticipate a minimum of 300 older adults with multimorbidity in community enrolling and completing data collection. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Conclusions: The collection and analysis of patient preference information will greatly improve the accuracy and effectiveness of digital health literacy interventions in the development, adoption, and economic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.