ArticleDigital health
Radiomics analysis based on plain X-rays to detect spinal fractures with posterior wall injury.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- YOLOv12 Algorithm-Aided Detection and Classification of Lateral Malleolar Avulsion Fracture and Subfibular Ossicle Based on CT Images: Multicenter Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Rehabilitation Driven Optimized YOLOv11 Model for Medical X-Ray Fracture Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Spinal fractures, particularly those involving posterior wall injury, pose a heightened risk of instability and significantly influence treatment strategies. This study aimed to improve early diagnosis and treatment planning for spinal fractures through radiomics analysis based on plain X-ray imaging. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed plain X-rays of patients with spinal fractures at the thoracolumbar junction. Radiomic features were extracted from both anteroposterior and lateral plain spine radiographs to evaluate the utility of radiomics in detecting posterior wall injury. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the radiomics models were assessed and compared with the performance of a spine surgeon. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, and four radiomic features were identified to construct radiomic signatures. In the training set, the RandomForest, ExtraTrees, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 1. In the validation set, the highest AUC value was 0.889, achieved by the RandomForest and XGBoost models. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the radiomics models outperformed those of the spine surgeon. Conclusions: Radiomics analysis based on plain X-ray imaging demonstrates significant potential for detecting posterior wall injury following spinal fractures. This approach offers a promising tool for early diagnosis and informed clinical decision-making in the management of spinal fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.