Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40015994›Full record

ArticleAndrology2025

Dupless: Toward a patient-friendly approach for erectile dysfunction nature differentiation - a study of 291 penile duplex Doppler ultrasound assessments.

Hille J Torenvlied, Kim E de Jager, Loes I Segerink, Rob C M Pelger, Jack J H Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hille J TorenvliedDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-9710-0477
Kim E de JagerDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Loes I SegerinkBIOS Lab on a Chip Group, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6943-8156
Rob C M PelgerDepartment of Urology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6328-6462
Jack J H BeckDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-9678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErectile dysfunction (ED) is a condition commonly classified as either psychogenic or organic. Traditional age-based categorizations are considered overly simplistic, yet many clinicians continue to rely on initial evaluation-patient symptoms and history, physical examination, blood tests, and questionnaires-for diagnosis due to limited modern tools.

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the predictive value of patient characteristics in individuals with "ED of indeterminate origin" following initial evaluation. Identifying these variables could enhance early diagnosis and reduce reliance on invasive procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent penile duplex Doppler ultrasound between January 2018 and January 2024 due to "ED of indeterminate origin". Patient data, including demographics, lifestyle factors, and medical history, were collected and analyzed using unpaired t-tests, chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression to assess their predictive value.

resultsAmong the 291 patients in the cohort, 165 (56.7%) were diagnosed with organic ED and 113 (38.8%) with psychogenic ED. Significant differences in age, history of diabetes mellitus, and drug use were noted. Logistic regression revealed multicollinearity among the variables and explained only 5.8% of the variance in ED etiology. Subgroup analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus predicts organic ED in patients aged 40 years and older, while psychopathology is linked to psychogenic ED. No significant predictors were identified for patients under 40 years. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe findings of this "Dupless" study highlight the limitations of relying solely on initial evaluation to differentiate ED etiology, stressing the need for additional diagnostic tools. While some predictive factors were identified, they proved insufficient for clinical use. Thus, an urgent need exists for the development of modern, noninvasive diagnostic tools to enhance ED classification. Future research could explore machine learning models to uncover complex patterns not evident in traditional statistical methods.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenisUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic screeningerectile dysfunctionerectile dysfunction etiologypatient characteristicspenile duplex doppler ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40015994
PMCPMC12569730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.