Trial reportJournal of pediatric nursing
Parent and pediatric nurse practitioner views on integrating the digital TELL tool intervention into clinical practice.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo understand the views of parent participants in our larger pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) about the Tool to Empower Parental TeLling and TaLking or the TELL Tool, a digital, psychoeducational and decision-support intervention; and to foster understanding about how pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) viewed integrating the TELL Tool into pediatric clinical settings. DESIGN AND
methodsIn this qualitative descriptive study, a purposive sample of 10 parents and 10 PNPs completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews by Zoom. The recordings were auto transcribed, checked for accuracy, and analyzed for themes. The rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique was incorporated into the analytic plan.
resultsFive themes emerged following analysis, including Perceptions, Optimal Time for Delivery, Most Appropriate Healthcare Provider to Counsel Parents about Disclosure, Challenges to Administering in Practice, and Recommendations for Implementing the TELL Tool into Pediatric Healthcare Settings.
conclusionsParents found the TELL Tool to be helpful and PNPs were supportive of incorporating the TELL Tool into clinical practice. Parents thought the TELL Tool increased their confidence about sharing information and appreciated its age-appropriate approach and language. PNPs perceived the tool as supporting their ability to provide anticipatory guidance and counseling/education to families seeking support in beginning and subsequent conversations with their children about their genetic origins. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The TELL Tool is an evidence-based intervention that can serve as a resource for PNPs while supporting parents as they navigate challenges about talking with their children about their genetic origins through gamete and embryo donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.