ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive genomics, probiotic, and antibiofilm potential analysis of Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from homemade and commercial dahi.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-guided characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Probiotics: multifunctional microorganisms for human health and biotechnological applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Genomic and metabolomic insights into the antimicrobial and therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Mitigating Virulence of Environmental Enterococcus faecalis Via Fermented Food-Derived Lactic Acid Bacteria.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Diversity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of encapsulation technology andFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Whole-genome analysis of Lysinibacillus boronitolerans MSR1: A dairy-isolated multidrug-resistant and non-pathogenic strain.PloS one · 2025Article
- Synergistic antibacterial effects of postbiotics combined with linezolid and amikacin against nosocomial pathogens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the probiotic properties and antibiofilm potential of Streptococcus thermophilus strains obtained from homemade and commercial dahi. The S. thermophilus strain from homemade dahi had greater acid tolerance than the commercial strain, indicating a greater capacity to live in the acidic environments of the stomach. The commercial strain had increased survivability in bile salts and was more hydrophobic than the homemade strain. These findings suggest improved adaptability and increased colonization in the gut. The genomes of both strains included genes associated with probiotic characteristics implying that the two strains may provide unique probiotic advantages. These findings highlight the importance of cell-free supernatants (CFS) of these strains in reducing biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry demonstrated that 2, 4-di-tert-butylphenol was a shared metabolite in the CFSs of both strains; however, 2-butanol was found only in the CFS of the homemade dahi strain. In-silico investigations revealed that compounds have drug-like characteristics, suggesting that they could be used for treating biofilm-associated diseases. This study highlights the health advantages of probiotics found in traditional dahi, but it also provides a way to develop natural antibacterial medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.