Trial reportBMC primary care2025
Digitally supported physical activity counselling for people with chronic back pain: a randomised controlled parallel feasibility study.
Trial report in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining MediQuit: an iterative, participatory approach to shared decision-making in deprescribing.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Development and proof-of-concept of a complex intervention to support appropriate imaging for musculoskeletal pain: the Betti programme.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuiding individuals with chronic back pain (CBP) to initiate and adhere to physical activity (PA) remains challenging. The study rationale is based on the need for innovative strategies, like digital tools, to better promote PA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using the digital consultation app ExPa (Exercise against Pain) to support PA consultations for CBP and its potential for a future effectiveness trial. The ExPa app shows the effect of PA on pain and provides individually tailored support to increase PA.
methodsIn a 2-arm randomised controlled feasibility study, we recruited 9 physicians and 37 CBP patients in Hesse (Germany). Using computer assisted cluster randomisation, 14 patients received ExPa counselling from their physician, while 17 patients received standard treatment. Main outcomes focused on study procedures and software use, with secondary outcome including pre- and post-intervention measurements of PA (International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), pain and mood (Short Form-12 (SF-12), Von Korff pain intensity and disability score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)). Additionally, project-tailored questionnaires and qualitative interviews assessed study procedures and software performance.
resultsStudy procedures were generally feasible. However, they took more time and dropouts as well as missing data presented challenges. This provided valuable insights for planning an effectiveness trial. Quantitative and qualitative data indicated that ExPa could have benefits for increasing PA and reducing pain.
conclusionsResults from the feasibility study indicate that improved procedures are necessary for a larger RCT. ExPa shows potential for positively impacting pain and PA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.