ArticleBMC nursing2025
Cancer rehabilitation in clinical practice: a qualitative study exploring contact nurses' views on prerequisites.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of nurse cancer survivors returning to work: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Person-Centred Nursing in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Conversation Tool: A Qualitative Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized cancer rehabilitation should be an integral part of cancer care. Contact nurses play a key role in identifying patient needs and coordinating evidence-based interventions to support rehabilitation. However, cancer rehabilitation remains marginal in current practice, as contact nurses face challenges due to the lack of systematic processes for assessment, intervention, and follow-up, limiting its implementation across the cancer care trajectory. This study aims to explore contact nurses in cancer care views on their role in and prerequisites for cancer rehabilitation.
methodsData were collected through 20 individual interviews with contact nurses working in Swedish cancer care and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsA holistic approach to cancer rehabilitation was emphasized, yet establishing routines for assessment and addressing patients' changing needs was described as challenging. Contact nurses experienced themselves as responsible for rehabilitation even though their role often was unclear. Rehabilitation was further seen as a process often determined by the medical trajectory rather than patients' needs. To establish prerequisites for cancer rehabilitation supportive leadership and sufficient resources is essential.
conclusionThere is a gap between cancer rehabilitation guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice, emphasizing the need for structure to support contact nurses to provide evidence-based individualized cancer rehabilitation. To enable cancer rehabilitation, supportive leadership at the organizational level is essential for contact nurses to establish routines in their clinical practice. These routines should align the rehabilitation process with patient needs, ensuring that rehabilitative services are effectively integrated into regular healthcare visits. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.