ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
How Individuals Seeking Help for Substance Use Disorder Adjusted to Virtual 12-Step Meetings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal engagement and drinking outcomes associated with mode of 12-step attendance.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Technology-based online support services are emerging as a resource for people recovering from substance abuse. This study presents findings on how individuals seeking help for a substance use disorder through 12-step fellowship meetings (Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous) adjusted to virtual rather than in-person meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifty individuals (50) were interviewed, recruited primarily from 12-step meetings in 3 locations in a rural New England state in the United States. Subjects were asked about whether they had attended virtual meetings during the pandemic, how online meetings compare to in-person meetings, and if they encountered any obstacles when attending virtual meetings (eg, Internet connectivity). More individuals preferred in-person meetings for a variety of reasons, although many participants were willing to give virtual meetings a try. Some participants continued to attend virtual meetings, even after in-person meetings returned. Positives of virtual recovery meetings included convenience and the fact that they could be accessed from anywhere. Internet connectivity and technical difficulties presented a challenge for some. Some individuals were unable to focus in virtual meetings and got easily distracted. Digital recovery support services should continue to be offered as some recovering individuals find them helpful. Virtual meetings are a resource, particularly for those individuals living in rural areas without many in-person resources readily available, or access to adequate transportation. Treatment providers working in rural states may consider advocating to policymakers for quality Internet services (eg, high-speed broadband access), to sufficiently meet residents' treatment and other healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.