ArticleBMJ public health2023
Assessing disparity in the distribution of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Australia: a retrospective cross-sectional study using Gini coefficients.
Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of AI in Identification of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Anogenital Dermatoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Using deep learning systems for diagnosing common skin lesions in sexual health.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Accuracy of symptom checker for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections using machine learning and Bayesian network algorithms.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence-powered screening for sexually transmitted infections-related skin lesions using clinical images and metadata.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying Individuals at High Risk for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections With an Artificial Intelligence-Based Risk Assessment Tool.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) varies substantially across population groups in Australia. We examined this disparity in HIV/STI distribution using Gini coefficients, where scores closer to one indicate greater disparity. Methods: We used demographic and sexual behaviour data from the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, between 2015 and 2018. We examined 88 642 HIV consultations, 92 291 syphilis consultations, 97 473 gonorrhoea consultations and 115 845 chlamydia consultations. We applied a machine learning-based risk assessment tool, MySTIRisk, to determine the risk scores. Based on individuals' risk scores and HIV/STIs diagnoses, we calculated the Gini coefficients for these infections for different subgroups. Results: Overall, Gini coefficients were highest for syphilis (0.60, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.64) followed by HIV (0.57, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.62), gonorrhoea (0.38, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.42) and chlamydia (0.31, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.35). Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) had lower Gini coefficients compared with heterosexual men or women; HIV (0.54 vs 0.94 vs 0.96), syphilis (0.50 vs 0.86 vs 0.93), gonorrhoea (0.24 vs 0.57 vs 0.57) and chlamydia (0.23 vs 0.42 vs 0.40), respectively. The Gini coefficient was lower among 25-34 years than in other age groups for HIV (0.66 vs 0.83-0.90) and gonorrhoea (0.38 vs 0.43-0.47). For syphilis, the oldest age group (≥45 years) had a lower Gini coefficient than 18-24 years (0.61 vs 0.70). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that HIV/STIs are more evenly distributed among GBMSM, suggesting widely disseminated interventions for GBMSM communities. In contrast, interventions for heterosexual men and women should be more targeted at individuals with higher risk scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.