Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017860›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Burden, determinants and treatment status of metabolic syndrome among older adults in India: a nationally representative, community-based cross-sectional survey.

Saurav Basu, Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Vansh Maheshwari, Mrunali Zode, Refaat Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saurav BasuIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1336-8720
Arun James ThirunavukarasuSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-4768
Vansh MaheshwariIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Mrunali ZodeIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Refaat HassanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3054-1161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome is a significance driver of mortality and morbidity in India, but nationally representative data regarding disease burden and treatment status are lacking. Here, a cross-sectional study was undertaken to establish national and regional estimates of disease burden and explore reasons for lack of treatment of component conditions of metabolic syndrome in Indian older adults (45 years and older). Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken using data from the first wave of the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-2018). Data for 66 606 individuals aged 45 years and above were analysed. The primary outcome was metabolic syndrome prevalence, defined by the National Cholesterol Education Programme ATP III criteria as an individual having any three of four component conditions: diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, abdominal obesity and hypercholesterolaemia. The secondary outcome of this study was treatment status of patients with component conditions. Results: Metabolic syndrome was found to have an overall weighted prevalence of 4.83% (n=3630, 95% CI 4.24 to 5.51). Females, urban residents, obese individuals and physically inactive people exhibited greater prevalence. The most prevalent component of metabolic syndrome was hypertension followed by abdominal obesity, DM and hypercholesterolaemia. 8.85% metabolic syndrome patient reported no treatment for component conditions, while 17.58% reported only partial treatment. Elderly individuals between 60 and 69 (crude relative risk ratios, cRRR 2.20, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.01) and 80 years and above (cRRR 7.48, 95% CI 1.99 to 28.16), urban residents (cRRR 2.45, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.05), those from richer monthly per capita consumption expenditure quintiles (cRRR 2.55, 95% CI 1.00 to 6.47) and those with additional comorbidities (cRRR 2.17, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.70) were more likely to report comprehensive treatment. Conclusions: This study highlights a substantial prevalence of metabolic syndrome in older adults in India and reveals remarkable disparities in provision of treatment. Better prevention, earlier detection and improved provision of treatment are urgently required to combat the rising prevalence of metabolic syndrome and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in India.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCommunity HealthEpidemiologyPrevalencePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40017860
PMCPMC11812726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.