Evidence mapPaperPMID 40018491Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Understanding the Impact of the Gut Microbiome on Mental Health: A Systematic Review.

Raja Gulfam Shaikh, Animesh Dey, Vindhya Prakash Singh, Anita Khandagle, Baskaran M, Sunil Naik, Asif Hasan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raja Gulfam ShaikhNeurology, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, IND.
Animesh DeyAllied Health Sciences, Brainware University, Kolkata, IND.
Vindhya Prakash SinghPsychiatry, Government Medical College, Azamgarh, IND.
Anita KhandagleNursing, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Nursing, Pune, IND.
Baskaran MMental Health Nursing, PSG College of Nursing, Coimbatore, IND.
Sunil NaikPhysiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Guntur, IND.
Asif HasanPsychology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health is a serious issue, with mental health disorders affecting millions of people globally. Gut microbiota has received considerable attention because of its potential role in the pathogenesis of mental health disorders. This systematic review synthesized 15 studies exploring the effects of the gut microbiome on depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, with qualitative and quantitative insights. The studies were conducted in different countries and employed various methods including 16S rRNA sequencing and metagenomic analysis with sample sizes varying from 50 to 600. Some of the key findings were that depression was associated with reduced microbial diversity and high levels of Firmicutes, and anxiety was associated with low levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria and high levels of Proteobacteria. Schizophrenia was related to endotoxemia and a reduction in the Lactobacillus count whereas bipolar disorder displayed a shift in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. Of interest, probiotics and dietary changes were as effective as drug treatment leading to symptom alleviation in many patients. It was found that depression was linked to less diverse gut bacteria while anxiety was associated with an increase in inflammatory bacteria. People with bipolar disorder were also found to have different gut bacteria patterns. This review also emphasizes the importance of the gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of mental disorders and the promising value of targeting microbiomes in pharmacological treatment approaches.

Indexed as

anxietybipolar disorderdepressiongut microbiotamental healthmicrobiome modulationschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40018491
PMCPMC11865252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.