ReviewBlood2025
Exploring the thrombus niche: lessons learned and potential therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shiver me timbers: cold-driven lipids fuel platelet production.Cell research · 2026Article
- Magnetic/photothermal dual-driven micro/nanorobots for synergistic NO-mediated photothermal thrombolysis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Toward improved thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: targeting nonfibrin components.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Development of the Neutrophil-to-Platelet Ratio (NPR) Integrated with Machine Learning for Predicting Early Mortality After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Article
- Clot Composition and Ischemic Stroke Etiology: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Smart Thrombosis Care: The Rise of Closed-Loop Diagnosis-to-Treatment Nano Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThrombus structure and composition are the main determinants of the severity, course, and outcomes of thrombosis. Detailed thrombus morphology has become available due to mechanical thrombectomy, which allows for the extraction of fresh thrombi from patients, followed by scanning electron microscopy. The major structural elements of a thrombus are platelets, erythrocytes, and fibrin, each playing a critical role in the determination of biological and physical properties of thrombi, such as permeability, stiffness, and lytic and mechanical stability. The minor components include neutrophils, monocytes, von Willebrand factor, cellular microvesicles, plasma proteins, cholesterol crystals, and other structures. Platelets are responsible for the contraction (retraction) of thrombi, which results in compaction with very little free space, low permeability, and high stiffness. Because of clot contraction, erythrocytes, which are prevalent in all types of thrombi, undergo compressive deformation to polyhedral (polyhedrocytes) and polyhedral-like cells, altogether comprising pressure-deformed cells (piezocytes). Fibrin is the structural and mechanical scaffold of thrombi that changes in time and space both quantitatively and qualitatively during their formation. Fibrin is an equilibrium polymer that can adapt to forced deformations by reorientation at the microscopic level and unfolding at the molecular level. The relative volume fractions of thrombus components, along with their functional and structural forms, vary substantially, providing a basis for the diverse pathogenic mechanisms and clinical manifestations of thrombosis. Modulating any of these components leads to prospective therapeutic approaches. This review summarizes recent research describing the quantitative and qualitative morphologic characteristics of arterial and venous thrombi, which provide a basis for new therapeutic opportunities in thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.