ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kidney genetic services are being created worldwide, revolutionising the way in which we manage families with suspected monogenic kidney disease. There is potential to learn from one another, whether one is just embarking on this journey or within an established kidney genetics service model with aspirations to optimise it further. This concluding portion of our two-part educational review explores the global efforts to integrate genomics into nephrology. We discuss key considerations for establishing kidney genetics services and share insights from successful implementation in Australia, India, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US), through case studies. Widespread integration of genomics within nephrology still faces barriers including limited genomics education among clinicians, high costs and ethical concerns. Educational strategies including workshop-based, online resources and clinical decision tools are aiming to address the genomic literacy gap among nephrologists. Multidisciplinary kidney genetics clinic models comprising nephrologists, geneticists, clinical scientists and counsellors are proving to be an effective model of delivering this diagnostic tool. Data of how kidney genetics clinics can foster collaboration with registries to facilitate research and shared learning to optimise care for patients are becoming evident. We also explore the importance of equitable access to genomics services across diverse populations, advocating for policies that address disparities in access to healthcare and genetic data representation. We hope to highlight the importance of upskilling the nephrology workforce to fully leverage the advances in genomic medicine and ensure comprehensive, accessible and personalised care for patients with genetic kidney diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.