Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019676›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2025

A Gene-Expression Based Comparison of Murine and Human Inhibitory Interneurons in the Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei.

Karl Schilling

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karl SchillingAnatomisches Institut- Anatomie und Zellbiologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nussallee 10, D53115, Bonn, Germany. karl.schilling@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar information processing is critically shaped by several types of inhibitory interneurons forming various intra-cerebellar feed-forward and feed-back loops. Evidence gathered over the past decades has focused interest on a non-uniform set of cortical inhibitory interneurons distinct from "classical" Golgi, basket or stellate cells, summarily referred to as PLIs (for Purkinje cell layer interneurons). Similarly, cerebellar nuclear inhibitory interneurons have gained increasing attention. Our understanding of the functions of these cells is still fragmentary. For humans, we lack functional data, and even any dependable morphological classification for these cells. Here, I used publicly available single cell based gene expression data to compare inhibitory interneurons from the cerebellar cortex and inhibitory nuclear neurons of humans and mice. Integration of nuclear and cortical cells revealed transcriptomic similarities between subsets of these cells and suggest known characteristics of cortical cell types may be helpful to devise strategies for the further characterization of nuclear inhibitory interneurons. Comparison of human and murine PLIs indicate that these strongly differ by the expression of genes used to characterize these cells in mice. This limits their utility to identify and classify human PLIs, and leaves the question open as to the number and characteristics of non-Golgi inhibitory interneurons resident in the cerebellar granule cell and Purkinje cell layers in humans.

Indexed as

Cerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiInterneuronsNeural InhibitionAnimalsGene ExpressionHumansMiceCerebellar cortexCerebellar nucleiGene expression analysisHumanInhibitory interneuronMouse

Identifiers

PMID40019676
PMCPMC11870911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.