Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Pimitespib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Japan: an expanded access program.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heat shock protein-mediated remodeling of the bone immune microenvironment: mechanisms and precision therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Autophagy-Apoptosis Crosstalk in Cancer: Mechanisms, Signaling Pathways, and Therapeutic Targeting.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPimitespib, an oral heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in CHAPTER-GIST-301 study. This expanded access program was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pimitespib in Japanese patients with advanced GIST.
methodsThis multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in patients (≥ 20 years) with histologically confirmed GIST who had been previously treated with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients received pimitespib 160 mg/day for five days, followed by a 2-day rest, in 21-day cycles.
resultsBetween February and August 2022, 23 patients were enrolled (median age 59.0 years). Over a median pimitespib treatment duration of 81.0 days, adverse events occurred in 22 patients (95.7%). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (73.9%), nausea (39.1%) and increased blood creatinine (30.4%). Serious adverse events occurred in two patients (tumor hemorrhage and tumor pain); neither was related to pimitespib. One patient had grade 3 diarrhea that was considered treatment-related. Four patients (17.4%) had eye disorders, all of which were grade 1 and treatment-related. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.2), the overall response rate was 0% (95% CI 0-16.1) and the disease control rate was 66.7% (95% CI 43.0-85.4).
conclusionsPimitespib was well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced GIST in real-world practice in Japan. No new safety signals were identified.
trial registrationjRCT2031210526 registered 1 February 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.