Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40019700›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

Copy number variations in spontaneous abortions: a meta-analysis.

Gleb V Drozdov, Anna A Kashevarova, Igor N Lebedev

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomics of pregnancy loss.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gleb V DrozdovTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia. gleb.drozdov@medgenetics.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-1013
Anna A KashevarovaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-4302
Igor N LebedevTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0482-8046

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-65-00017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to analyze copy number variations (CNVs) in spontaneous abortions with a euploid karyotype, irrespective of the method used for CNV detection. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between 2006 and 2023 were selected through the PubMed database. Studies were included if they involved CNV analysis in spontaneous abortions using any CNV detection method. The pathogenic significance of CNVs was interpreted based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Nineteen publications met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1425 CNVs were identified in 550 samples from 3953 euploid spontaneous abortions, representing 14% of the cases. Among the detected CNVs, 9% were classified as pathogenic, and 7.5% were likely pathogenic. The most frequently observed pathogenic CNVs included 22q11.2 deletion/duplication, 16p13.11 deletion, 15q11.2 deletion/duplication, 1p36.33 duplication, and 17p13.3 duplication. The genomic regions with the highest frequency of CNVs, regardless of their pathogenic effect, were 8q24.3, 16p13.3, 21q22.3, Xp22.33, Xp22.31, and Xq28. No clear associations were found between specific CNVs and pregnancy loss. However, deletions in the 22q11.2 region emerged as the most likely candidates contributing to lethality during the early stages of embryonic development.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansPregnancyCopy number variation (CNV)MiscarriagePregnancy lossSpontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID40019700
PMCPMC12055740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.