ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
A low-dose protocol in pediatric
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the feasibility of a low-dose
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 pediatric patients who underwent a full-dose (3.7 MBq/kg)
resultsIn G2.0 and G3.0, all cases (112/112) achieved an image score of ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (98/98). There were no significant differences in SNR between G2.0 and G3.0 (11.09 ± 2.31 vs. 11.88 ± 2.58, p = 0.39), nor between age groups ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.52 ± 3.16 vs. 9.53 ± 3.19, p = 0.99). In G3.0', 98.2% of cases (54/55) had an image score ≥ 3 and a lesion detection rate of 100% (43/43). The SNR of every age group for G3.0' was comparable to that of G2.0, and no significant differences between ≤ 5 years and 6-10 years groups (9.32 ± 1.94 vs. 9.99 ± 2.28, p = 0.82).
conclusionsA 2.5 MBq/kg dose with a 3.0 min/bed acquisition protocol is feasible for
Indexed as
Identifiers
40019733What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.