SynthesisMedicine2025
Circulating cytokines levels and the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome: A Mendelian randomization analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Gene Alterations in the Pathogenesis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive value of serum sortilin, HMGB1, and galanin-like peptide for gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Causal Relationships Among Lifestyle, Lipidome, and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal relationship between circulating cytokines and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and to identify potential biomarkers of PCOS mechanisms. Genetic instrumental variables for cytokines were derived from 2 large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving 8293 and 14,824 European participants. Summary statistics from a GWAS meta-analysis (10,074 PCOS cases and 103,164 controls of European ancestry) were used in the discovery phase of MR analysis. Replication analysis utilized another GWAS meta-analysis dataset (3609 cases and 229,788 controls). The primary analysis employed the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, with secondary methods including constrained maximum likelihood model averaging, weighted median, and weighted mode. Meta-analysis was combined with MR results, while heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were assessed using leave-one-out, MR-Egger intercept test, and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Reverse MR analysis was used to explore the association of PCOS with the identified cytokines. Meta-analysis revealed that increased CCL4 (C-C motif chemokine 4) levels were associated with a higher risk of PCOS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.123, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.056-1.195; P < .001). Decreased PCOS risk was linked to CXCL11 (C-X-C motif chemokine 11, OR = 0.930, 95% CI: 0.890-0.970; IVW-false discovery rate [FDR] P = 4.85 × 10-4) and CD6 (T-cell surface glycoprotein CD6 isoform, OR = 0.730, 95% CI: 0.890-0.970; IVW-FDR P = .008). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. MR analysis suggests a potential causal link between alterations in CCL4, CXCL11, CD6, and PCOS risk, highlighting the role of cytokines in PCOS development and progression, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.