ReviewChemical reviews2025
Design Approaches That Utilize Ionic Interactions to Control Selectivity in Transition Metal Catalysis.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Enantioselective Alkene Aminoarylation to Form Chiral Indolines via Electrostatically-Directed Palladium Catalysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Probing Into Asymmetric Dearomatizing Photocycloadditions of 2-Naphthalene Derivatives With Alkenes: [2 + 2] and [4 + 2] Pathways.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Rational Design of Supramolecular Fe and Mn Oxidation Catalysts.Accounts of chemical research · 2026Article
- Asymmetric Desymmetrizing Sulfonylation of Diarylmethanes via Peptidyl-Cu(I)-Catalysis with Remote Stereocontrol.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Palladium-catalyzed enantioselective dienylation of propargylic carbonates via sulfonimidamide desymmetrization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enantiotopic-group-selective coupling for unified access to carbazole atropisomers as versatile chiral chromophores.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bifunctional Catalysis of Aldol Reactions by Foldamer Dihydrazides: Assessment of Conformational Preorganization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Tunable Endo/Exo Selectivity in Direct Catalytic Asymmetric 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions with Polyfunctional Lewis Acid / Azolium-Aryloxide Catalysts.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The attractive force between two oppositely charged ions can constitute a powerful design tool in selective catalysis. Enzymes make extensive use of ionic interactions alongside a variety of other noncovalent interactions; recent years have seen synthetic chemists begin to seriously explore these interactions in catalyst designs that also incorporate a reactive transition metal. In isolation, a single ionic interaction exhibits low directionality, but in many successful systems they exist alongside additional interactions which can provide a high degree of organization at the selectivity-determining transition state. Even in situations with a single key interaction, low directionality is not always detrimental, and can even be advantageous, conferring generality to a single catalyst. This Review explores design approaches that utilize ionic interactions to control selectivity in transition metal catalysis. It is divided into two halves: in the first, the ionic interaction occurs in the outer sphere of the metal complex, using a ligand which is charged or bound to an anion; in the second, the metal bears a formal charge, and the ionic interaction is with an associated counterion.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.