ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2025
More X's, more problems: how contributions from the X chromosomes enhance female predisposition for autoimmunity.
Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of sex and gender in autoimmune thyroid diseases: mechanisms and knowledge gaps.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- The SLC15A4-TASL complex is essential for lupus development in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The X Factor in Immunity: Sex Differences Shaped by the X Chromosome.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- The impact of X chromosome inactivation on human health.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Understanding Sex Differences in Autoimmune Diseases: Immunologic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Inactive X Chromosome: A Genetic Driver of Female-Biased Rheumatic Autoimmune Disorders?European journal of immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many autoimmune diseases exhibit a strong female bias. While sex hormones may influence sex bias in disease, recent studies suggest that the X chromosome itself directly contributes to female-biased susceptibility to autoimmunity. Females with two X chromosomes utilize X Chromosome Inactivation (XCI) to silence gene expression from one X chromosome, equalizing expression between the sexes. The X chromosome is highly enriched with immune-related genes, and recent work indicates that the fidelity of XCI maintenance in lymphocytes from female systemic lupus erythematosus patients is compromised, suggesting that aberrant X-linked gene expression contributes to autoimmune phenotypes. XCI is initiated and maintained by the long noncoding RNA XIST/Xist through its interactions with the inactive X chromosome and numerous interacting proteins, and recent studies also implicate XIST/Xist RNA in driving endosomal Toll-like receptor signaling and XIST/Xist RNA-protein complexes in serving as a source of autoantigens to respectively drive autoimmunity. Here, we will review these three distinct pathways that underscore the significance of X-linked genetics for understanding the origins of the female bias in autoimmune disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.